Re: is that useful?

[sperber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor])]

>>>>> "WP" == Walter C Pelissero <walter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

WP> The reason why you can't see the point for a more complete solution
WP> than this SRFI is that you limited your view to map and for-each.

No, I haven't.  I've only examined those to get at the numbers.  I was
too lazy to do a more complete analysis.  Let me repeat again: I
*remember* often wishing for something like SRFI 26 while writing
code.  I don't remember *ever* wishing for something more general.

-- 
Cheers =8-} M.
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla