This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 26 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 26 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.
>>>>> "Dave" == Dave Mason <dmason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: Dave> But in the case of SRFI-26 or other very small bits of code, I am Dave> *far* more likely to simply define my own macro that does what I need Dave> than to have a bunch of SRFI-0 code to find out if what I want is Dave> available and if not define my own. Sure. In that case, you're no worse off because of the existence of SRFI 26. Arguably, you're probably just going to copy the sample implementation into your own code. Dave> On the other hand, if it was a more general SRFI that solved Dave> most of the problems, I'd be more likely to use it. So we're trying to figure out if the SRFI is general enough. Walter says it isn't. I say it is. It solves most of my problems. Is it general enough for you? -- Cheers =8-} M. Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla