[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Changing the name
>>>>> "felix" == felixundduni <felix> writes:
felix> I agree.
felix> (After all, what's so "unintuive" about `section'? After all
felix> this is *exactly* what SRFI-26 does. Using terminology that is
felix> already in common use (Haskell) is the obvious solution, IMHO)
>> I think, when you're arguing about intuition, you need to show why
>> something is intuitive, not why something is not unintuitive. Many
>> Scheme programmers aren't Haskell programmers or ML programmers first.
>> When I tell students I'm teaching ML or Haskell "this is called
>> operator section," there's always row after row of blank faces. They
>> don't find this intuitive at all. I completely fail to see why it
>> should be "obvious."
felix> I don't understand that example you give. Once a term has been coined
felix> it might as well be used. Would your students find `named let' intuitive?
They actually do. I don't see why a term coined somewhere else needs
to be used *here*.
felix> No offense, Mr. Egner, but this is ridiculous.
I'm Mr. Sperber, actually. (Even though some people might find
"Mr. Egner" more intuitive :-) )
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla