This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 26 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 26 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.
>>>>> "John" == John David Stone <stone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: John> Michael Sperber writes: >> It doesn't look as though the poster knows what "curry" means >> outside the context of this SRFI. John> That is quite true -- as I say, he's trying to _find out_ what John> currying does. So why is he looking at SRFI-26? Because it deals with a John> macro named CURRY -- if the macro were called SECTION instead, he probably John> would never have seen SRFI-26. So why can't we fix that by a perhaps improved explanatory paragraph in the SRFI? I have a hard time seeing this specific "incident" as enough reason to warrant the change. (Note that I'm not averse to other arguments. I just haven't seen anything that convinces me.) <joke>You can't seriously be advocating a change with the intention of making less people see the SRFI, right?</joke> -- Cheers =8-} M. Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla