[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Changing the name
>>>>> "John" == John David Stone <stone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
John> Michael Sperber writes:
>> It doesn't look as though the poster knows what "curry" means
>> outside the context of this SRFI.
John> That is quite true -- as I say, he's trying to _find out_ what
John> currying does. So why is he looking at SRFI-26? Because it deals with a
John> macro named CURRY -- if the macro were called SECTION instead, he probably
John> would never have seen SRFI-26.
So why can't we fix that by a perhaps improved explanatory paragraph
in the SRFI? I have a hard time seeing this specific "incident" as
enough reason to warrant the change. (Note that I'm not averse to
other arguments. I just haven't seen anything that convinces me.)
<joke>You can't seriously be advocating a change with the intention of
making less people see the SRFI, right?</joke>
Cheers =8-} M.
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla