[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: OK, how about...
One thing I've wanted that the proposal doesn't cover is the ability to
reorder the arguments.
I like the idea but:
(curry - <2> <1>) == (lambda (x1 x2) (- x2 x1))
"<1>" is not a number but plays the role of one. The indirection
seems needlessly unparsimonious, hence, unschemelike. Suppose, for
example, that while processing code that uses this macro I want to
sort a list of "<1>...<20>".
Perhaps a different syntax?