This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 24 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 24 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.
Whether this is an issue depends on if define-record, define-values etc. can be macros that expand to "define"s and "define-syntax"es or not. But given that the name of the draft is "Define-syntax in local lexical scopes" it seems reasonable to define only the use of define-syntax and keep the letrec-mixed just as a construct to explain easily the semantics. BTW, does someone know whats going on with the SRFI process? Why there are drafts that are expired several months ago? -- Antti Huima