[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Having multiple Schemes supporting SRFI-22 installed on the same system

To: felix <felix@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Having multiple Schemes supporting SRFI-22 installed on the same system
From: Michael Sperber <sperber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 12:11:16 +0200
Cc: srfi-22@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: srfi-22@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <y9lisbmgj9u.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (felix@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx's message of "Fri, 13 Aug 2004 01:16:12 +0200 (DFT)")
References: <y9lisbmgj9u.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) XEmacs/21.5 (chayote, berkeley-unix)

>>>>> "felix" == felix  <felix@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

felix> How about "officially" allowing implementation-specific aliases, like:

felix> scheme-r5rs.sisc
felix> scheme-srfi-0.chicken

felix> etc.

felix> ?

I don't think there's anything forbidding it.

I don't understand the problem you're trying to solve: Presumably, the
scripts interpreters are all pretty much equivalent.  Just pick any
one.

-- 
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Having multiple Schemes supporting SRFI-22 installed on the same system
  - From: felix

References:
- Having multiple Schemes supporting SRFI-22 installed on the same system
  - From: felix

Prev by Date: Having multiple Schemes supporting SRFI-22 installed on the same system
Next by Date: Re: Having multiple Schemes supporting SRFI-22 installed on the same system
Previous by thread: Having multiple Schemes supporting SRFI-22 installed on the same system
Next by thread: Re: Having multiple Schemes supporting SRFI-22 installed on the same system
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread