[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: compilability of scripts
> Marc> Alternatively, this search for the file to load could be done by
> Marc> "scheme-script" only if the script file argument has no extension
> Marc> (under UNIX you can only invoke a script with the same extension as
> Marc> its filename, but under Windows, scripts must have the extension
> Marc> ".BAT" or ".CMD" and can be invoked with or without the extension).
> Marc> So, a script "S.scm" will always load "S.scm", but a script "S" may
> Marc> load "S.fasl", "S.foobar", "S.bat", "S", etc.
> Is it really necessary to put something like this in the SRFI
> document? After all, the details of this are likely
> necessarily implementation-dependent, and the SRFI surely doesn't
> prevent an implementation from supporting something like this
> without losing portability of the script source code.
I believe that such an implementation would not be SRFI 22 compliant.
Currently the SRFI says that
scheme-script filename ...
will load the Scheme script in the file "filename". If a system loads
the file "filename.o1" instead, then that is surely not conformant.
If you want scripts to be compilable, SRFI 22 has to provide for this