[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: semantics and portability

To: Marc Feeley <feeley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: semantics and portability
From: sperber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor])
Date: 20 Mar 2001 11:37:42 +0100
Cc: srfi-22@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: Marc Feeley's message of "Fri, 9 Mar 2001 14:56:58 -0500"
References: <200103091755.f29HtRs18476@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <y9lvgpibyzv.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200103091956.f29Juwq18706@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: sperber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.2 (Thelxepeia (GTK Inside))

>>>>> "Marc" == Marc Feeley <feeley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

Marc> No.  All I am saying is that the process started to run the underlying
Marc> interpreter should have the same (shell) environment as the one of
Marc> "scheme-script".

After rereading this, I'm still not sure I get it.  "scheme-script"
*is* the underlying interpreter, no?

-- 
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla

Follow-Ups:
- Re: semantics and portability
  - From: Marc Feeley

References:
- semantics and portability
  - From: Marc Feeley
- Re: semantics and portability
  - From: Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]
- Re: semantics and portability
  - From: Marc Feeley

Prev by Date: Re: Command-line-parameter access
Next by Date: Re: The "\ filename" meta switch
Previous by thread: Re: semantics and portability
Next by thread: Re: semantics and portability
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread