[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Bug in time<=? and time>=?

Thanks for the report - I've fixed the reference implementation.

Dave Gurnell <dave@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I think there is a bug in the implementation of the aforementioned
> procedures. The same bug is present in time<=? and time>=?. I'll use
> the PLT implementation of time<=? as an example:

Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla