[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: date->string ~D dd/mm/yy vs mm/dd/yy

My intent is what is in the reference implementation, but given the difficulty in modifying the SRFI, should we just change the implementation?

Will Fitzgerald

On Sunday, May 25, 2003, at 08:49  PM, Kevin Ryde wrote:

The documentation for date->string says ~D gives dd/mm/yy, but the
reference implementation says mm/dd/yy.  (Assuming I'm looking at the
right bits of both.)


Which is intended?

Please Cc followups.