[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: date->string ~D dd/mm/yy vs mm/dd/yy



My intent is what is in the reference implementation, but given the difficulty in modifying the SRFI, should we just change the implementation?

Will Fitzgerald
wfitzg@xxxxxxxx

On Sunday, May 25, 2003, at 08:49  PM, Kevin Ryde wrote:

The documentation for date->string says ~D gives dd/mm/yy, but the
reference implementation says mm/dd/yy.  (Assuming I'm looking at the
right bits of both.)

    http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-19/srfi-19.html
    http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-19/srfi-19.scm

Which is intended?

--
Please Cc followups.