Re: date->string ~D dd/mm/yy vs mm/dd/yy

[Will Fitzgerald <wfitzg@xxxxxxxx>]

My intent is what is in the reference implementation, but given the 
difficulty in modifying the SRFI, should we just change the 
implementation?

Will Fitzgerald
wfitzg@xxxxxxxx

On Sunday, May 25, 2003, at 08:49  PM, Kevin Ryde wrote:

> The documentation for date->string says ~D gives dd/mm/yy, but the
> reference implementation says mm/dd/yy.  (Assuming I'm looking at the
> right bits of both.)
>
>     http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-19/srfi-19.html
>     http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-19/srfi-19.scm
>
> Which is intended?
>
> --
> Please Cc followups.