[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Minor Correction?

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 18 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 18 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

Shouldn't the definition of thread-terminate! state that threads
which are not the current thread should terminate immediately?

> If thread is not running or it is the current thread, it is
> terminated immediately, otherwise the scheduler may wait until the
> thread blocks or is preempted before terminating it.


Mark K. Gardner
Network Engineering, CIC-5
Los Alamos National Laboratory
P.O. Box 1663, M.S. D451
Los Alamos, NM 87545
Email: mkg@xxxxxxxx
Phone: 1-505-665-4953