[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: continuations and threads

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 18 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 18 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

   Cc: srfi-18@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
   From: sperber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor])
   Date: 21 Mar 2000 13:35:12 +0100
   User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) XEmacs/21.2 (Iris)
   Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

   >>>>> "Matthias" == Matthias Felleisen <matthias@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

   Matthias> Marc, my gut feeling is that exceptions and threads would
   Matthias> take you far. 

   Sorry Matthias for being flippant, but in my mind, that's tantamount
   to saying that a Turing machine would take you far.  

It's not. Read "On the expressive power of programming languages." 

   I actually have at least one application (PGG) which is really dependent
   upon CALL/CC, but beside that, I often just plain *want* to use CALL/CC
   even when I could, in principle, with some more thought, use something

   Anyway, this discussion really belongs some other place.

Yes, but where else do serious people discuss such a question?