[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: time to finish off/up srfi-17
Shriram Krishnamurthi <shriram@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> As for this phrase, "abusing the process", I searched through the mail
> archive a few days ago and, interestingly enough, I don't believe I
> (or anyone else critical of Per) introduced it -- it was Per who did.
I don't think I meant the phrase as a literal quotation, and I
probably should not have put quotation marks around the phrase.
comes pretty darn close to accusing me of abusing the process as
well as intellectual dishonesty:
"I personally am disappointed that the proponents of this SRFI have
done little other than indicate it is good because it exists, while it
exists because it is good. [Our objections] haven't ever been
properly answered. ... I had hoped for a better discussion on a SRFI."
"... the SRFI process allows strategies such this to succeed in
producing final SRFIs. I hope it won't be repeated ..."
If this is not an assusation of abusing the process, I don't know what