[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: where is srfi-17 going?

Mikael Djurfeldt <mdj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> We have no supported way of setting the setter associated with a
> getter, but rather have a constructor
>   make-getter-with-setter GETTER SETTER
> with corresponding selector

Sorry, it's

  make-procedure-with-setter PROCEDURE SETTER
  procedure PWS
  setter PWS

(I'm very busy with other things right now, and don't really have time
 to spend on this discussion, even though I'd like to.)