[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: where is srfi-17 going?

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 17 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 17 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

Mikael Djurfeldt <mdj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> We have no supported way of setting the setter associated with a
> getter, but rather have a constructor
>   make-getter-with-setter GETTER SETTER
> with corresponding selector

Sorry, it's

  make-procedure-with-setter PROCEDURE SETTER
  procedure PWS
  setter PWS

(I'm very busy with other things right now, and don't really have time
 to spend on this discussion, even though I'd like to.)