[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: specification by implications and example

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 17 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 17 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.



Per Bothner wrote:

> How about this change to the SRFI?  [...]

If this is the change you want, so be it.  You should also edit the
"Standard setters" section to be of the form

  (setter car-proc) --> set-car!

where car-proc is eq? to the built-in primitive car, and so forth,
rather than the current format.

'shriram