[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: specification by implications and example

Per Bothner wrote:

> How about this change to the SRFI?  [...]

If this is the change you want, so be it.  You should also edit the
"Standard setters" section to be of the form

  (setter car-proc) --> set-car!

where car-proc is eq? to the built-in primitive car, and so forth,
rather than the current format.