[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: let-fluid problem
> Olin writes:
>> This seems like a waste of a SRFI to me.
>>>>> On Wed, 24 Nov 1999 12:02:06 -0500, Lars Thomas Hansen <lth@xxxxxxxxxxx> said:
> To each his own. I guess the editors felt differently.
Not necessarily. The editors try to maintain quality and consistency,
but aren't allowed to officially *feel* anything about the
appropriateness of a proposal.
Personally, I'd like to not have too many SRFIs that are unused
because they were too short-sighted. I'd be a lot happier if all of
the SRFIs were such that most implementers felt they were appropriate
(or even essential) to support.
../Dave (not writing as an Editor :-)