[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Omit predicate->char-set and char-set-invert[!] ?

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 14 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 14 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

I think both are sometines useful.   If the result table
representation gets too large, the implementation can use
procedural representation.   Yet, for some implementations,
those functions reserve a room of some optimization.

From: Brad Lucier <lucier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Omit predicate->char-set and char-set-invert[!] ?
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 15:17:12 -0500 (EST)

> The functions predicate->char-set and char-set-invert[!] can take a
> long time if you define char-sets on a Unicode system (which you can do
> on Gambit-C), especially if you follow the suggestion in the body of
> the proposal:
> "Large" character types, such as Unicode, should use a sparse representation,
> taking care that the Latin-1 subset continues to be represented with a
> dense 32-byte bit set.