[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SRFI-1/SRFI-13 inconsistency in tabulate procedure

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 13 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 13 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

To: shivers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: SRFI-1/SRFI-13 inconsistency in tabulate procedure
From: Shriram Krishnamurthi <sk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 11:48:15 -0500 (EST)
Cc: sperber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, srfi-13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, srfi-1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200103211536.KAA01504@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <k1ae6g9gvv.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <y9lsnk7a6zv.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200103211536.KAA01504@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

shivers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

>    Olin> Send them to srfi-1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
>    That mailing list has long been disabled because of the above reason.
> 
> Would you re-enable it?

I have just done so.  This message ought to get entered in the
archive.

Shriram

References:
- SRFI-1/SRFI-13 inconsistency in tabulate procedure
  - From: Olin Shivers
- Re: SRFI-1/SRFI-13 inconsistency in tabulate procedure
  - From: Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]
- Re: SRFI-1/SRFI-13 inconsistency in tabulate procedure
  - From: shivers

Prev by Date: Re: SRFI-1/SRFI-13 inconsistency in tabulate procedure
Next by Date: More on SRFI-1/SRFI-13 inconsistency in tabulate procedure
Previous by thread: Re: SRFI-1/SRFI-13 inconsistency in tabulate procedure
Next by thread: More on SRFI-1/SRFI-13 inconsistency in tabulate procedure
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread