[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SRFI-1/SRFI-13 inconsistency in tabulate procedure

To: shivers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: SRFI-1/SRFI-13 inconsistency in tabulate procedure
From: Shriram Krishnamurthi <sk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 11:48:15 -0500 (EST)
Cc: sperber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, srfi-13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, srfi-1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200103211536.KAA01504@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <k1ae6g9gvv.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <y9lsnk7a6zv.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200103211536.KAA01504@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

shivers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

>    Olin> Send them to srfi-1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
>    That mailing list has long been disabled because of the above reason.
> 
> Would you re-enable it?

I have just done so.  This message ought to get entered in the
archive.

Shriram

References:
- SRFI-1/SRFI-13 inconsistency in tabulate procedure
  - From: Olin Shivers
- Re: SRFI-1/SRFI-13 inconsistency in tabulate procedure
  - From: Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]
- Re: SRFI-1/SRFI-13 inconsistency in tabulate procedure
  - From: shivers

Prev by Date: Re: SRFI-1/SRFI-13 inconsistency in tabulate procedure
Next by Date: More on SRFI-1/SRFI-13 inconsistency in tabulate procedure
Previous by thread: Re: SRFI-1/SRFI-13 inconsistency in tabulate procedure
Next by thread: More on SRFI-1/SRFI-13 inconsistency in tabulate procedure
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread