[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Updated editorial draft
I have a new draft of SRFI-114 at
<http://ccil.org/~cowan/temp/srfi-114.html>. (Editors, please update.)
After discussion on IRC, I have switched from </<? to in-open-interval?
and correspondingly for <=/<=?, </<=?, and <=/<?. The new names are
syntactically easier to grasp and specify the intent more clearly.
I have added accessors for the four procedures in a comparator in
addition to the applicators provided; these are useful when calling
higher-order functions. A fifth applicator applies the type test and
signals an error rather than returning `#f` when it fails.
I have also added an index of defined identifiers.
If you understand, John Cowan
things are just as they are; http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
if you do not understand, cowan@xxxxxxxx
things are just as they are.