This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 113 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 113 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.
Aubrey Jaffer scripsit: > But SET->BAG! has two arguments; which comparator is used? I've changed the text to say the comparators must be the same, which was my intention, and fixed the code to verify it. Note that the "Specification" section says "It is an error for any procedure defined in this SRFI to be invoked on sets or bags with distinct comparators (in the sense of eq?)." The new text and code are in the same place. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@xxxxxxxx One art / There is / No less / No more To do / All things / With sparks / Galore --Douglas Hofstadter