[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: checking set intersection

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 113 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 113 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

Kevin Wortman scripsit:

> We already have predicates for set equality, subsets, proper subsets,
> and are now discussing intersection. We might as well add a
> set-disjoint? predicate too so that all the fundamental set
> relationships are represented.

This is just the negation of `set-intersects?`.

John Cowan <cowan@xxxxxxxx>             http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
The internet is a web of tiny tyrannies giving an illusion of anarchy.
                --David Rush