[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: checking set intersection
Kevin Wortman scripsit:
> We already have predicates for set equality, subsets, proper subsets,
> and are now discussing intersection. We might as well add a
> set-disjoint? predicate too so that all the fundamental set
> relationships are represented.
This is just the negation of `set-intersects?`.
John Cowan <cowan@xxxxxxxx> http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
The internet is a web of tiny tyrannies giving an illusion of anarchy.