[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Open issues for SRFI 113



Alex Shinn scripsit:

> I'd have to see it, but I don't think it's worth the
> complexity of supporting both.

It's not too hard; I'll issue another draft.

> The canonical use case is SRFI 13.  Many of the procedures
> accept a char/char-set/procedure argument.  The only two
> SRFI 14 procedures needed to support that are `char-set?' and
> `char-set-contains?'.

Mmm.  What concerns me is that while this works for the "set or
individual" use case, you would need other subsets for other use
cases, and where do you stop?

-- 
John Cowan  <cowan@xxxxxxxx>  http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
        Raffiniert ist der Herrgott, aber boshaft ist er nicht.
                --Albert Einstein