[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Open issues for SRFI 113

Alex Shinn scripsit:

> I'd have to see it, but I don't think it's worth the
> complexity of supporting both.

It's not too hard; I'll issue another draft.

> The canonical use case is SRFI 13.  Many of the procedures
> accept a char/char-set/procedure argument.  The only two
> SRFI 14 procedures needed to support that are `char-set?' and
> `char-set-contains?'.

Mmm.  What concerns me is that while this works for the "set or
individual" use case, you would need other subsets for other use
cases, and where do you stop?

John Cowan  <cowan@xxxxxxxx>  http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
        Raffiniert ist der Herrgott, aber boshaft ist er nicht.
                --Albert Einstein