[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Open issues for SRFI 113
> I agree. My only reservation is that hash tables will have to support
> naked equality predicates for backward compatibility with SRFI 69 and
> R6RS. But I think we can allow them in that SRFI and deprecate them
> instead of allowing them anywhere. Removed.
I have added this paragraph:
Implementations must support any comparator that provides
both a comparison procedure and a hash function, as well
as the comparators `eq-comparator`, `eqv-comparator`, and
`equal-comparator`. Implementations may support other
comparators, possibly with some degradation of performance.
This permits an all-singing all-dancing implementation to use hash tables
if a hash function is available, trees if a comparison procedure is
available, and lists if neither is available.
I suggest you solicit aid of my followers John Cowan
or learn the difficult art of mud-breathing. cowan@xxxxxxxx
--Great-Souled Sam http://www.ccil.org/~cowan