[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: First cut at "curly-write" and "neoteric-write" with -shared and -cyclic versions

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 110 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 110 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

To: "cben" <cben@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: First cut at "curly-write" and "neoteric-write" with -shared and -cyclic versions
From: "David A. Wheeler" <dwheeler@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 20:47:43 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: "srfi-110" <srfi-110@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: srfi-110@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CALJxeiLLV2tGn8vA-nURF1CZw1Q8o87rs9+3YxXdD0dspokvvA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: dwheeler@xxxxxxxxxxxx

Good news!!  Thanks to help from Beni Cherniavsky-Paskin, I found the problem
in the *-write-shared tests.  It turns out the problem was in the tests, not the tested code;
guile 2.0 does some sharing that I believe is legal, but more than I expected it to do.

I fixed the test suite and it now passes.  So it appears that our sample implementation
is working just fine.

Beni: Thanks very much!!

--- David A. Wheeler

References:
- Re: First cut at "curly-write" and "neoteric-write" with -shared and -cyclic versions
  - From: Beni Cherniavsky-Paskin

Prev by Date: Let's delay release of SRFI-110
Next by Date: Comment on SRFI-110 and Comparison to Genyris xyzzy
Previous by thread: Re: First cut at "curly-write" and "neoteric-write" with -shared and -cyclic versions
Next by thread: Updated: SRFI-110 specification and reference implementation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread