This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 110 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 110 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.
foo (a b) ==> (foo (a b))
foo $ a b ==> (foo (a b))
(a b) ==> (a b)
$ a b ==> ((a b))Â ; huh?!
foo a ==> (foo a)
foo $ a ==> (foo a)
a ==> a
$ a ==> (a)Â ; huh?!
In other words, I feel that since "$ ..." always produces one object (whether atom or list), it should be exempt from wrapping in a list if "$ ..." is the first thing on a line.
This implies that "$ $ $ a" ==> a.Â I'm not sure I love that, but that's how "\\ \\ \\ a" works now.
[*] I'veÂ ignored the do-nothing leading \\ usage for stylisitically indenting some things, e.g. Arc's flat if and keyword args:
! \\ then1 ...
! \\ arg ...
IIRC this is currently ascribed to GROUP's disappearing act, but the same effect with \\ could also be explained as a SPLIT with nothing on one side.
Alternatively, you can drop the behavior from \\ and use $ instead:
! $ then1 ...
! $ arg ...
but that'd miss the symmetry that now exists with one-liner form:
! cond1Â\\ then1 ...
! kw:Â\\ arg ...
P.S. Cosmetic points:
- We'd lose the diagonal look of \\ which felt appropriate for GROUP.
+ The remaining sense of \\ will be familiar to TeX users ;-|
Â Curiously, the blank-line semantics (comment = not blank) also match.