[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: First impressions of the specification

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 110 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 110 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

To: "srfi-110" <srfi-110@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: First impressions of the specification
From: "David A. Wheeler" <dwheeler@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 17:58:47 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-to: srfi-110@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <87r4j87yy6.fsf@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <87r4j87yy6.fsf@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: dwheeler@xxxxxxxxxxxx

Mark H Weaver:
> I'm sorry to say that I find that
> section extraordinarily unclear.

I wonder - would it be better if we rewrote the spec using the
BNF as a template?  That would at least make it easier to
follow the BNF that follows, and since the BNF actually
implements the notation, it's clearly formal enough :-).

--- David A. Wheeler

Follow-Ups:
- Re: First impressions of the specification
  - From: Mark H Weaver

References:
- First impressions of the specification
  - From: Mark H Weaver

Prev by Date: Re: First impressions of the specification
Next by Date: Re: First impressions of the specification
Previous by thread: Re: First impressions of the specification
Next by thread: Re: First impressions of the specification
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread