[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: updated SRFI-108
On 02/04/2013 12:29 PM, Per Bothner wrote:
A possible solution/compromise is to *require* that "&name[initial-exp]"
be followed by a braced-delimited literal part, if necessary empty:
This avoids the incompatibility. It makes parsing slightly more
complex, but the extra code and state needed is small.
To clarify: Parsing is slightly more complex if an implementation
wishes to support *both* SRFI-108 and R6RS brackets-as-parens
(or Kawa's brackets-as-vector-constructor). At least if not
requiring a separator between a symbol and a starting bracket.