[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Please update SRFI-106



Takashi Kato scripsit:

> If nothing will be raised for a week, I will request SRFI editors to
> make this SRFI final.

I finally got around to reading the spec closely; my apologies if these
questions have been asked and answered.

1) Why are there both flag-creating macros and constant variables with
flag values?  It would seem to be enough to just have one.  Personally I
favor having the macros, though I can see arguments both ways.

2) There is no meaningful support for UDP.  I think a socket API
shouldn't ignore UDP.

-- 
On the Semantic Web, it's too hard to prove     John Cowan    cowan@xxxxxxxx
you're not a dog.  --Bill de hOra               http://www.ccil.org/~cowan