[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Sockets Layer Counter Proposal



Shiro Kawai scripsit:

> If you don't like all-caps names, I'd suggest to use
> a *consistent* rule to convert well-established names
> to schemey-names.  E.g. SOCK_STREAM -> *sock-stream*

The cl-posix-generalities page on Cliki has this set of mapping rules:

    A symbol name is derived from the C binding's name, by:

        1) uppercasing, then

        2) replacing underscore (#\_) characters with the hyphen (#\-)

        3) where the fields of a C structure all have a common prefix
        (for example, "st_"), we omit it.

        4) constant names get prefix and suffix '+'s.

    No other changes to "Lispify" symbol names are made, so creat()
    becomes CREAT, not CREATE.

Rule 1 would not be relevant to Scheme, of course.  +...+ names are
valid in R7RS but not in R6RS or earlier.

Fortran 95 bindings to Posix do similar things.  Ada, however, provides
higher-level bindings.

-- 
John Cowan                              <cowan@xxxxxxxx>
            http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
                .e'osai ko sarji la lojban.
                Please support Lojban!          http://www.lojban.org