Re: I think we're done with SRFI-105!

[Alan Manuel Gloria <almkglor@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 12:39 AM, David A. Wheeler
<dwheeler@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I think we're done with SRFI-105!  Please post ASAP if there is some really important problem with the specification as posted.  Unless I hear otherwise soon, we're done.
>
> My sincere THANKS to EVERYONE who commented on the spec or otherwise worked on it!  I appreciate all your time.
>
> At this point, I hope that Scheme implementations will consider implementing it in their default distributions.  My thanks to those who have already started this process.
>
> --- David A. Wheeler
>

Caught a minor typo:

diff --git a/SRFI-105.html b/SRFI-105.html
index 52c2566..23546c5 100644
--- a/SRFI-105.html
+++ b/SRFI-105.html
@@ -1138,7 +1138,7 @@ in a file (e.g., put a newline in front of it).
 If the file began with <var>#!curly-infix</var>, is made executable,
 and then execution is attempted,
 this might confuse some systems into trying to run the
-program <var>srfi-105</var>.
+program <var>curly-infix</var>.
 </p>

 <p>By intent, this SRFI (including the enabling mechanism)

--

I pushed this on the devel branch of readable-code.