[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: I think we're done with SRFI-105!

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 105 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 105 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 12:39 AM, David A. Wheeler
<dwheeler@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I think we're done with SRFI-105!  Please post ASAP if there is some really important problem with the specification as posted.  Unless I hear otherwise soon, we're done.
> My sincere THANKS to EVERYONE who commented on the spec or otherwise worked on it!  I appreciate all your time.
> At this point, I hope that Scheme implementations will consider implementing it in their default distributions.  My thanks to those who have already started this process.
> --- David A. Wheeler

Caught a minor typo:

diff --git a/SRFI-105.html b/SRFI-105.html
index 52c2566..23546c5 100644
--- a/SRFI-105.html
+++ b/SRFI-105.html
@@ -1138,7 +1138,7 @@ in a file (e.g., put a newline in front of it).
 If the file began with <var>#!curly-infix</var>, is made executable,
 and then execution is attempted,
 this might confuse some systems into trying to run the
-program <var>srfi-105</var>.
+program <var>curly-infix</var>.

 <p>By intent, this SRFI (including the enabling mechanism)


I pushed this on the devel branch of readable-code.