This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 105 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 105 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.
+1 for #!curly-infix On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 2:26 AM, Shiro Kawai <shiro@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > +1 for #!curly-infix > > From: "David A. Wheeler" <dwheeler@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: #!curly-infix vs. #!srfi-105 > Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2012 21:09:55 -0400 (EDT) > >> On the guile-devel mailing list I got another input preferring #!curly-infix over #!srfi-105. >> >> Sjoerd van Leent Privé (...svanleent *AT* gmail.com) said: >>> I believe it is information versus information. I believe strongly that >> a notion of #!curly-infix would be more readable than #!srfi-105. The >> latter doesn't explain at all why the file looks drastically different, >> whereas a notion of #!curly-infix (or #!sweet-scheme, #!scheme for the >> same reason) is more understandable. >> >> Other thoughts? >> >> --- David A. Wheeler >>