[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Updated SRFI-105

To: dwheeler@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Updated SRFI-105
From: Michael Sperber <sperber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 21:12:09 +0200
Cc: srfi-105@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: srfi-105@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <E1T8he6-0006wC-0P@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (David A. Wheeler's message of "Mon, 03 Sep 2012 21:09:37 -0400 (EDT)")
References: <E1T8he6-0006wC-0P@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) XEmacs/21.5-b31 (darwin)

"David A. Wheeler" <dwheeler@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I've also sent this to the SRFI editors, but I'm sure they're busy, so
> we can start looking at it now.  I tried to respond to most of the
> comments.

Sorry, I must have missed it.  Should be up now!

-- 
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla

Follow-Ups:
- Updated SRFI-105 (2012-09-08)
  - From: David A. Wheeler

References:
- Updated SRFI-105
  - From: David A. Wheeler

Prev by Date: Predefined nfx considered harmful
Next by Date: Re: Predefined nfx considered harmful
Previous by thread: Re: srfi-105 and srfi-38
Next by thread: Updated SRFI-105 (2012-09-08)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread