[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Updated SRFI-105 highlights

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 105 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 105 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

Here are highlights of the changes to SRFI-105:

* Mandate equal? comparison for simple curly-infix lists, e.g., to handle ",op" as an operator See http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-105/mail-archive/msg00018.html http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-105/mail-archive/msg00027.html
*    More examples, make clear in the abstract that the users are ANYONE who wants infix, both those less familiar and those very familiar with Scheme. http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-105/mail-archive/msg00014.html http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-105/mail-archive/msg00015.html
*   Mandate returning nfx, and drop transform-mixed-infix. http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-105/mail-archive/msg00018.html
*    Make it clear that application authors can override/define "nfx".
*    Handle f(x).  I've embedded neoteric-expressions inside curly-infix. http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-105/mail-archive/msg00000.html http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-105/mail-archive/msg00001.html  This means that {-(x) / y} is allowed, for example.
*    Drop enable-..., and add marker such as #!srfi-105 or #!c-expr http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-105/mail-archive/msg00027.html  A lengthy rationale was added to discuss this.

--- David A. Wheeler