[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SRFI 105: Curly-infix-expressions
David A. Wheeler scripsit:
> It was hard enough coming up with a unique name. prefix-expressions =>
> p-expressions sounds like "pee-expressions", and function-expressions
> => f-expressions sounds like "f*n-expressions". "m" and "s" are
> already taken. I'm willing to entertain alternatives (got any?),
> but I'm not really excited about creating yet another name. It took
> a long discussion to get to that one. Besides, if the biggest problem
> is the name, life is good :-).
If you go from three layers (c-exprs, n-exprs, sweet-exprs) to just two
(c-exprs that may contain n-exprs, sweet-exprs), then you don't need a
separate name for n-exprs.
If you understand, John Cowan
things are just as they are; http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
if you do not understand, cowan@xxxxxxxx
things are just as they are.