[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

*To*: srfi-105@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx*Subject*: Re: SRFI 105: Curly-infix-expressions*From*: "David A. Wheeler" <dwheeler@xxxxxxxxxxxx>*Date*: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 20:32:29 -0400 (EDT)*Delivered-to*: srfi-105@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx*In-reply-to*: <20120828164950.GD21464@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>*References*: <E1T5yPU-0002vK-HK@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120827.132321.714642731706132049.shiro@xxxxxxxx> <E1T6CGb-0006vj-7N@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120827.221343.839189494752364317.shiro@xxxxxxxx> <E1T6LFI-0005jw-D3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAF+kUQUZTXenxao9JDMAOjPLRJPr5HiA0SP6WXWDpvJ0DPo5SA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120828164950.GD21464@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>*Reply-to*: dwheeler@xxxxxxxxxxxx

John Cowan: > Insofar as possible, the > R7RS-small committee doesn't consider proposals that don't already have > widespread implementations; this one is certainly not ripe. If there > is substantial traction for this in the next year or two (which will > take heroic lobbying efforts), you can ask for it to be added to the > WG2 input hopper. Yes, it's my hope that we get it into the WG2 input hopper. But I completely agree, a standards group should generally be standardizing stuff that is already implemented, preferably in many places. I don't expect WG1 to consider this. My hope for WG1 is that they don't endorse something that would make this impossible later (and I don't think they have). One thing that'd be *nice* would be if WG1-small would be willing to add "{" and "}" as delimiters. But it's certainly not necessary, and I've been presuming that we wouldn't be able to influence WG1-small, given the current state. --- David A. Wheeler

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: SRFI 105: Curly-infix-expressions***From:*John Cowan

**References**:**Re: SRFI 105: Curly-infix-expressions***From:*David A. Wheeler

**Re: SRFI 105: Curly-infix-expressions***From:*Shiro Kawai

**Re: SRFI 105: Curly-infix-expressions***From:*David A. Wheeler

**Re: SRFI 105: Curly-infix-expressions***From:*Shiro Kawai

**Re: SRFI 105: Curly-infix-expressions***From:*David A. Wheeler

**Re: SRFI 105: Curly-infix-expressions***From:*Alan Manuel Gloria

**Re: SRFI 105: Curly-infix-expressions***From:*John Cowan

- Prev by Date:
**Re: SRFI 105: Curly-infix-expressions** - Next by Date:
**Re: SRFI 105: Curly-infix-expressions** - Previous by thread:
**Re: SRFI 105: Curly-infix-expressions** - Next by thread:
**Re: SRFI 105: Curly-infix-expressions** - Index(es):