Re: SRFI 105: Curly-infix-expressions

[John Cowan <cowan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Alan Manuel Gloria scripsit:

> The implementation *must not*, by default, bind the symbol `nfx`
> to a procedure or macro; this symbol is reserved for use by library
> writers and application writers.

That still seems unnecessary to me.  In a library-based implementation,
it makes no difference; in a flat namespace, the name can be overridden.

-- 
As you read this, I don't want you to feel      John Cowan
sorry for me, because, I believe everyone       cowan@xxxxxxxx
will die someday.                               http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
        --From a Nigerian-type scam spam