[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SRFI 105: Curly-infix-expressions

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 105 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 105 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

Alan Manuel Gloria scripsit:

> The implementation *must not*, by default, bind the symbol `nfx`
> to a procedure or macro; this symbol is reserved for use by library
> writers and application writers.

That still seems unnecessary to me.  In a library-based implementation,
it makes no difference; in a flat namespace, the name can be overridden.

As you read this, I don't want you to feel      John Cowan
sorry for me, because, I believe everyone       cowan@xxxxxxxx
will die someday.                               http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
        --From a Nigerian-type scam spam