Re: miscellaneous

[Taylor R Campbell <campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

   Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:07:20 -0400
   From: David Van Horn <dvanhorn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

   I could add conversion functions if that seems useful (they are trivial 
   to define in terms of the folds given).  In a system that really 
   embraces the random-access pair type as fundamental, these would just be 
   identities.

I think this would be good: otherwise programs would not be able to
portably exploit systems that embrace random-access lists.