[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: importing srfi-101



Shiro Kawai wrote:
Aubrey Jaffer wrote:
I think having SRFI-101 shadow R6RS identifiers is the most common way
that SRFI-101 would be used.

Is this true?  Since srfi-101's data structure is incompatible
to the built-in pairs, you can't pass srfi-101 list to the
imported procedures that expects built-in list, and vice versa.
(Or am I missing something?)

I don't think you're missing anything. Passing a random-access list to a procedure expecting a sequential list will not work.

If you import srfi-101 shadowing r6rs list primitives, you pretty much commit to live in srfi-101 world, isolated from
other libraries that deal with native lists.   That's ok
for experimental work, but for practical applications
I'd rather imagine that it'd be more common to import srfi-101
procedures with prefix, and the user converts normal lists
and srfi-101 lists as needed.

Agreed, I think this will be the more common usage.

I would like to accommodate the other usage by providing a replacement (rnrs base) library---as a convenience only---that uses random-access pairs in place of traditional pairs. I am not entirely sure this can be done as an R6RS library, but I'm not entirely sure it can't either.

David