[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New SRFI 0 draft
Many thanks, Marc, for the new draft. It's a definite improvement.
From a first look (I'll have a second look tomorrow),
I'd still like to suggest two things to be addressed:
- Import of feature implementations (IMHO) *needs* to be made
explicit. Scheme implementations which load additional features
on-demand (such Scheme 48) would *have* to say NO to any feature
requested. In the present form, there's little chance that Scheme
implementations with such a design philosophy will adopt the present
- By now several Scheme implementors have expressed their preference
for a separate configuration language. Richard, of course, Will,
Donovan, and the Rice folks. Is there a strong reason *not* to do
it this way?
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla