[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SRFI 0 philosophy [WAS: logical operations in if-implements]
> So, in conclusion, I don't think leanness and simplicity is
> sacrificed by making SRFI 0 more elaborate. I think making SRFI 0
> more elaborate is necessary to make it sufficiently useful.
At this point I think we really need more input from others and
particularly implementors. As I have said before SRFI-0 is at the
heart of the SRFI process so we need to have something that has
widespread acceptance. My views can be bent if I see that enough
people want a particular form (multiway conditional, support for
"and", "or", "not", etc).
So I send a plea to everyone: if you have a view on this subject now
is the time to voice it.