This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 0 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 0 are here. Eventually, the entire history will be moved there, including any new messages.
In this note I describe a problem with the following paragraph of Marc Feeley's original draft of SRFI 0: When writing portable code, the case used for the feature identifier should match the one in the SRFI registry. This is to ensure that the feature identifier will be correctly recognized whether or not the Scheme system is case-sensitive. To support case-insensitive Scheme systems, the feature identifiers in the SRFI registry are guaranteed to be unique even when ignoring the case. The last sentence of this paragraph is certainly important, but it goes without saying because all implementations of IEEE/ANSI or R5RS Scheme are case-insensitive. I don't think an SRFI should be cluttered by explicit consideration of every possible way in which an implementation of Scheme can be in conflict with the SRFI because the implementation is already in conflict with the IEEE/ANSI or R5RS specifications of Scheme, but I do understand why known problems should be addressed. In my opinion, the paragraph quoted above fails to address a known problem. For this particular SRFI, it is easy to foresee that systems that violate the IEEE/ANSI/R5RS requirements for case-insensitivity may be unable to recognize that the following are equivalent: (write (if-implements SRFI-0 1 2)) (WRITE (IF-IMPLEMENTS SRFI-0 1 2)) (Write (iF-iMPLeMeNTS SRFI-0 1 2)) I do not, however, see why such a system should have any problem with (write (if-implements SRFI-0 1 2)) (write (if-implements srfi-0 1 2)) (write (if-implements SrFi-0 1 2)) because the IF-IMPLEMENTS special form can convert the feature identifier to a canonical case before processing it. So the paragraph in question addresses a non-problem, but does not address the real problem that arises in case-sensitive implementations. The real problem is recognition of the IF-IMPLEMENTS special form, not the recognition of feature identifiers. The paragraph quoted at the beginning of this message therefore serves no purpose, except perhaps to mislead some readers into thinking that SRFI 0 was designed to work with case-sensitive implementations of Scheme. Will